The reason for unnecessary aggression and hostility is mental illness, especially among Kurds
The cause of aggression and hostility without cause
"Unreasonable" aggression and hostility always have hidden roots that are not visible at the moment. These behaviors are usually caused by a combination of accumulated psychological stress, biological disorders or learned behavioral patterns.
The most important causes of this type of aggression are:
• Impulse attack disorder (IED): This is a mental disorder in which a person experiences sudden, intense and irrational outbursts of anger that are completely out of proportion to the situation.
• Chronic psychological stress and anxiety: When a person's mental capacity is full due to financial, work or family problems, the slightest stimulus can lead to an outburst of anger.
• Hidden depression: Contrary to popular belief, depression is not always accompanied by sadness; in many people, especially men and adolescents, depression manifests itself in the form of irritability and aggression.
• Passive-Aggressive: Some people use destructive, stubborn, or indirect oppositional behaviors to assert their opinions instead of directly expressing their disagreement.
• Physical and biological problems: Chronic sleep deprivation, hormonal changes (such as thyroid problems or PMS), low blood sugar, and even vitamin deficiencies can severely lower a person's tolerance threshold.
• Trauma and past experiences: People who grew up in aggressive environments or have experienced trauma may see the world as a threatening place and have a defensive or aggressive guard by default.
• When should you be concerned?
• If these aggressions are repetitive, damage social and family relationships, or the person feels intense regret afterward, consulting a psychologist on sites such as Tarmankadeh or Yasan is recommended to examine the roots in more detail.
• The clinic.
• Do these behaviors intensify in certain situations or are more pronounced with a specific person?
Key causes of hostility in the Middle East and among Kurds:
The hostility in the Middle East, especially among Kurds, is rooted in the legacy of colonialism, artificial borders, ideological diversity, and conflicting interests of political parties. The division of Kurdistan between four countries, along with regional interference and differences in goals (armed struggle versus negotiation), has created the basis for internal conflicts.
Legacy of colonialism and artificial borders: The division of territories (especially Kurdistan) after World War I scattered the Kurds across four countries (Turkey, Iran, Iraq, Syria), causing the Kurds to be affected by the domestic politics of each country.
Differences in political approaches (Kurds): Intense competition between different Kurdish parties (such as the Iraqi Kurdistan Civil War) in different regions (Iran, Iraq, Turkey, Syria), which has sometimes led to armed conflicts for power and influence.
Regional and international interventions: Neighboring countries and global powers have often used Kurdish groups to pressure each other, leading to further divisions among the Kurds themselves.
Ideological diversity: The stark difference between leftist currents (such as the kdp) and conservative nationalist currents in different regions of Kurdistan makes convergence difficult.
Geopolitics and security: The Kurdish regions have become a “pressure zone” in the Middle East, causing any internal developments to directly affect their relations with central governments.
The conflicts and tensions between the nations of the Middle East, especially in the case of the Kurds, are rooted in a set of historical, political and social factors that have affected the region for decades. Here are the main reasons for this “mutual antagonism”:
1. Colonial legacy and artificial borders
After World War I and the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, new borders (such as the Sykes-Picot Agreement) were drawn without regard to ethnic, linguistic, and religious context. The Kurds, as the largest stateless ethnic group, were divided among four countries: Iran, Iraq, Turkey, and Syria, which has been a constant source of tension between them and the central governments.
2. Nationalism and nation-state building
In the 20th century, regional states were built on the basis of extreme nationalism (pan-Arabism, pan-Turkism, etc.). This approach led to ethnic minorities such as the Kurds being ignored or pressured for cultural assimilation. In contrast, the formation of Kurdish nationalism was also a reaction to these pressures, which intensified the conflicts.
3. Geopolitical Rivalry and Proxy Wars Regional powers (such as Iran, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Israel) and global powers have often used ethnic or religious groups as a means to pressure their rivals. This “Great Game” has led nations in the region to view each other as security instruments or threats rather than partners.
4. Religious and ideological conflicts
Religious divisions (especially between Shiites and Sunnis) and religious extremism in recent decades have added a new layer of violence to ethnic conflicts. Extremist groups use religious identity to promote hostility towards the “other.”
5. Resource crisis and unfair development
The unequal distribution of wealth and natural resources (such as oil and water) in Kurdish areas and the deprivation of these areas by central governments have fueled feelings of discrimination and public anger.
6. Lack of democracy and civil institutions
In the absence of democratic structures that can guarantee the rights of minorities, violence and repression have become the only solution for governments to manage protests. This cycle of repression and uprisings has further increased the wall of mistrust between nations.
Conclusion:
In the case of the Kurds, this conflict is largely due to a crisis of identity and the right to self-determination within borders that have ignored them. Until the cultural and political rights of these groups are recognized within a democratic structure, these tensions will continue in various forms.
Would you like to discuss further the influence of global powers on these conflicts or the situation of a specific country in the region?
In summary, the main causes of these tensions are:
The legacy of Sykes-Picot and artificial demarcations: The division of Kurdish lands among four countries has led to the formation of different interests and priorities for the Kurds of each country.
The conflict and tension in the Middle East, especially among the Kurds, is rooted in complex factors including colonial divisions (Sykes-Picot), geopolitical rivalries, ideological differences and foreign interventions among the Kurds, differences in political approaches (radical left vs. traditional), party interests and geo-national divisions in four different countries (Iran, Iraq, Syria, Turkey) have led to the emergence of intra-ethnic confrontations.
Before that, the fratricidal war between the Kurdistan Democratic Party of Iran and the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) weakened the military forces of both parties against the Islamic Republic.
Party and ideological rivalry: Especially in Iraqi Kurdistan, the historical rivalry between the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) has led to civil war and long-standing disputes. Also, the differences between leftist movements (such as the PKK) and more traditional parties widen the gaps.
The cause of the resentment towards each other has its roots in colonial and colonialist mentalities.
There is a lot of resentment from members of the Kurdistan Democratic Party of Iraq towards those Kurds who think differently from them, and paying money to destroy these people is also part of the mental illness of this party, which does not have a good history.
The cause of the resentment towards each other has its roots in colonial and colonialist mentalities.
The great resentment of members of the Kurdistan Democratic Party of Iraq towards those Kurds who think differently from them, and the payment of money to destroy these people, is also part of the mental illness of this party, which does not have a good history.
Anti-Gurranism by Sunni Kurds Both are Kurds, but the Soranis are seen as enemies of the Gurran people in their essence. They may say one thing on the surface, but inwardly, in their behavior and actions, something else is seen in the aggressive behavior of these people.
Written by Samuel Kermashani
0 Comments